Prepare the evidence brief
Collect approved public and internal sources into a short research pack with links, dates, gaps, and open questions.
Consulting / research, delivery, and client knowledge
Consulting teams do not need more notes. They need the right evidence sooner.
We build private workflows that search approved project material, prepare research briefs, draft reports or proposals, and keep client knowledge separated. The consultant remains responsible for the conclusion, recommendation, and client relationship.
Project boundariesResearch briefsDraft reportsConsultant review
Pattern demonstration / no client data
The consulting knowledge problem
The answer exists somewhere in the project.
Consultants move between interviews, research, models, reports, proposals, and client context. The wrong shortcut is to mix all of it into one memory.
Search the engagement
Find interview notes, assumptions, analyses, and prior decisions within the correct client or project boundary.
Draft the artifact
Use approved precedent and project evidence to prepare a report, proposal, workshop pack, or executive summary.
Client work needs separation
Reuse structure, not confidential material.
Keep the client boundary
Matter, project, team, and personal notes need access rules before retrieval or drafting.
Trace the recommendation
Research claims and client facts should point to their source or be marked for consultant review.
Protect the promise
A draft does not approve a recommendation, a number, a scope, or a claim about the client.
A consulting pilot
Choose one project artifact.
Name the project and output
Choose research brief, proposal, report, interview synthesis, or workshop preparation.
Select approved material
Define the client sources, public sources, precedent, access group, and documents that must stay out.
Test the synthesis
Review citations, assumptions, project mixing, unsupported claims, and the difference between evidence and recommendation.
Give the team a repeatable path
Document how new material enters, how a project is closed, and who reviews the output.
The consultant's value is judgment. AI should reduce the time spent finding and formatting the evidence around it.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Straight answers
Common questions.
Can it search across all client projects?
Not by default. Client and project boundaries must be explicit, and reusable precedent must be separated from confidential engagement material.
Can it write the final report?
It can prepare a draft from approved evidence and structure. The consultant reviews the facts, analysis, recommendation, and tone.
Can it monitor a market for a client?
Yes, as a separately scoped intelligence workflow with approved watchlists, sources, citations, tuning, and delivery rules.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the deliverable
Which consulting artifact takes too long to assemble?
Tell us the project boundary, source material, output, and reviewer. We will map a workflow that protects client context.