Find the right example
Search approved proposals, reports, templates, and prior work for the section, proof, or structure that fits.
Drafting workflow / precedent and evidence
The next proposal should not start from a blank page.
We connect approved proposals, reports, case material, briefs, and source documents to a drafting workflow that prepares a strong first version. The writer reviews the claims, scope, numbers, and tone before anything goes to a client or partner.
Approved precedentSource-linked draftsScope checksHuman edit
Pattern demonstration / synthetic material
Where drafting time disappears
The blank page is not the only problem.
Teams lose time finding precedent, checking whether claims are supported, and moving approved information into the required format.
Build the first version
Combine the brief, source material, required sections, and constraints into a draft the writer can improve.
Expose unsupported claims
Flag missing evidence, stale numbers, scope drift, invented details, and sections that need a subject-matter owner.
The draft is not the decision
Speed is useful when review stays visible.
Use approved precedent
The corpus should contain documents the team is allowed to reuse, with owners and dates that can be checked.
Keep the evidence close
Numbers, capabilities, case facts, and promises should have an internal source or be marked for review.
Protect the quote
The person responsible for delivery confirms what is included, excluded, priced, and actually possible.
A better first draft
Give the model the brief the writer already needs.
Choose the document
Name the proposal, report, memo, response, or recurring artifact and its required sections.
Curate the precedent
Select approved examples, source facts, brand or client rules, exclusions, and the person who reviews the result.
Test the claims
Review unsupported language, stale evidence, scope changes, missing context, and the tone of the output.
Publish through the owner
The writer edits, approves, and sends the draft. The workflow records what source and version produced it.
A useful draft is not the end of expertise. It is the part of the page that lets expertise start sooner.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Can it write the whole proposal?
It can prepare a first draft from an approved brief and precedent. The team reviews facts, scope, price, claims, and client fit before delivery.
Can it use prior client work?
Only approved material with a clear reuse and access boundary. Sensitive or client-specific documents should not enter a general corpus by default.
Can it create reports from spreadsheets?
Yes, when the source, metric definitions, output format, and review owner are defined. Spreadsheet and slide generation can be separate scope items.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the blank page
What document keeps starting from zero?
Tell us the source material, required format, reviewer, and claim or scope checks the draft must pass.