Build the chronology
Extract events, dates, documents, and parties from approved matter material into a reviewable timeline.
Legal support / document work and matter files
Paralegals do the work lawyers bill around, and search for facts instead.
We deploy private workflows that prepare chronologies, document production sets, exhibit lists, and deadline notes from approved matter files. The supervising lawyer keeps legal judgment, review, and sign-off.
ChronologiesDocument productionExhibit listsDeadline notes
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where paralegal time goes
The facts are in the file. The hours are in finding them.
Every chronology, production, and exhibit list starts with the same task: read the matter material, identify the relevant items, and build the reviewable list.
Prepare the document set
Identify responsive documents, organize them by category, and list missing or uncertain items for review.
Track the open commitments
Prepare the deadline and follow-up note from filings, correspondence, and matter records.
The legal boundary
The system prepares the work. The lawyer owns the file.
Every output is a draft
Chronologies, production sets, and notes are prepared for the supervising lawyer to review and correct.
Use approved matter records
Documents, correspondence, and filings remain linked to the work product that uses them.
Legal duties stay with counsel
The workflow supports the file. Legal advice, privilege decisions, and sign-off stay with the lawyer.
A first paralegal workflow
Choose the artifact the team builds by hand.
Name the artifact
Pick a chronology, production set, exhibit list, or deadline note with a known matter and owner.
Scope the matter corpus
Define the documents, folders, and parties included and the material that stays outside.
Test with the actual matter
Compare the prepared artifact with the team's own work and fix gaps, duplicates, or boundary errors.
Hand over the review step
Document the source map, permission groups, and the lawyer responsible for final review.
A paralegal is faster when the file is organized enough to answer the next question without a full re-read.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this give legal advice?
No. It prepares chronologies, production sets, and notes. Legal advice, privilege, and review stay with the supervising lawyer.
Can it decide what is privileged?
No. Privilege and confidentiality decisions stay with counsel and the client. The workflow only organizes approved matter material.
How is this different from contract search?
That page covers finding clauses across an archive. This page is the paralegal's recurring artifact: chronology, production, and deadline work.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the artifact
Which paralegal task takes the most hours?
Tell us the matter material, the artifact you need, and the review lawyer. We will scope the first workflow around the file you already trust.