Build the case timeline
Organize events, evidence, correspondence, and procedural history into a reviewable chronology.
Legal practice / litigation
Litigation is a chronology and court file, not a series of panic drafts.
We build private workflows that organize pleading drafts, disclosure indexes, deadline calendars, and court bundle skeletons for litigation matters. The workflow prepares the file; the litigation team owns strategy and the court owns the outcome.
Pleading draftsDisclosure indexDeadline calendarCourt bundle
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where litigation time goes
The court file is rebuilt for every event.
Pleadings, disclosure, evidence, and deadlines each have their own owner. The expensive work is keeping them aligned.
Index the documents
Prepare the disclosure list, source links, and open items for the litigation team.
Keep the court calendar
Track hearings, filing dates, responses, and follow-ups beside the matter file.
The litigation boundary
The system prepares the file. It does not conduct the case.
Strategy stays professional
Pleadings, privilege, and litigation strategy remain with the qualified litigation team.
Outcomes stay judicial
Orders, findings, and procedural decisions remain with the court.
No automatic filing
Filing, service, and court communication stay with the lawyer and the applicable process.
A first litigation workflow
Start with the court file the team rebuilds.
Choose the matter
Pick the case type and the document pack the team prepares most often.
Map the case records
List pleadings, evidence, disclosure, correspondence, and deadlines behind the matter.
Prepare the drafts
Build the chronology, disclosure index, and bundle skeleton for the team's review.
Hand over the calendar
Deliver the drafts, deadlines, and open questions to the responsible lawyer.
A litigation file is stronger when the deadline, document, and strategy stay connected.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this draft the final pleading?
No. It prepares drafts and indexes. Content, strategy, and signing stay with the litigation team.
Can it file documents with the court?
No. It prepares the bundle and checklist. Filing and service stay with the lawyer and the court process.
How is this different from the criminal defence page?
That page covers criminal defence specifically. This page covers litigation generally: pleadings, disclosure, calendars, and bundles.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the court file
Which litigation pack takes the team longest?
Tell us the matter type, the case records, and the reviewing lawyer. We will scope a workflow around the firm's own litigation process.