Keep the claims register
Organize claims, proof documents, amounts, status, and decisions into a current register.
Legal practice / insolvency
Insolvency is a claims and statutory calendar, not a single filing.
We build private workflows that organize claims registers, creditor packs, statutory calendars, and review trails for insolvency engagements. The workflow prepares the record; the qualified practitioner owns the process and the court or authority owns the outcome.
Claims registerCreditor packsStatutory calendarReview trail
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where insolvency work goes
The engagement runs on a public record and a deadline.
The recurring work is keeping claims, creditors, correspondence, and statutory dates in one defensible file.
Prepare the creditor pack
Assemble notices, reports, meeting material, and correspondence for the responsible practitioner.
Track the statutory dates
Maintain filing, meeting, claim, and reporting dates beside the engagement record.
The insolvency boundary
The system prepares the record. It does not administer the estate.
Administration stays professional
Estate decisions, reports, and statutory duties remain with the qualified insolvency practitioner.
Outcomes stay official
Orders, distributions, and approvals remain with the court, authority, or applicable process.
Records stay attached
Every claim, notice, and report draft remains linked to the engagement material that produced it.
A first insolvency workflow
Start with one engagement record.
Choose the engagement
Pick the administration, liquidation, or restructuring matter the team manages most.
Map the records
List claims, creditor documents, statutory dates, and owners behind the engagement.
Prepare the review pack
Assemble the current claims, calendar, and open questions for the practitioner.
Maintain the trail
Record decisions, correspondence, and next steps so the next review starts current.
An insolvency engagement is easier to defend when the claim and its statutory date stay together.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this administer an insolvency estate?
No. It prepares registers, packs, and calendars. Administration and statutory duties stay with the qualified practitioner.
Can it file statutory notices automatically?
No. It prepares drafts and reminders. Filing and official communication stay with the practitioner.
How is this different from the law firms page?
That page covers law firms broadly. This page is insolvency specific: claims, creditors, statutory dates, and review trails.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the engagement
Which insolvency record is hardest to keep current?
Tell us the engagement, the claims and creditors, the statutory dates, and the practitioner. We will scope a workflow around the records the team already holds.