Organize the request queue
Prepare intake records with requester, matter type, priority, owner, and current status.
Legal / in-house teams
In-house legal is a request and matter queue, not just contract review.
We build private workflows that organize intake requests, matter status, contract approvals, and board updates for in-house legal teams. The workflow prepares the queue; legal advice, privilege decisions, and business approvals stay with the company.
Intake requestsMatter statusContract approvalsBoard updates
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where in-house time goes
The request, the matter, and the answer are split across tools.
The team spends as much time tracking who asked, what changed, and what is waiting as it does on the legal content.
Keep the matter current
Assemble contract, approval, correspondence, and decision records into a matter view.
Prepare the update pack
Draft the legal update, open risks, and decision points for the business or board review.
The in-house boundary
The system prepares the queue. It does not become the lawyer.
Privilege decisions stay legal
Matter access, confidentiality, and privilege review remain the legal team's call.
Advice stays professional
Legal positions, approvals, and advice remain with qualified counsel.
Business decisions stay commercial
The workflow does not approve contracts, spend, or strategy on the company's behalf.
A first in-house workflow
Start with the request type that repeats.
Choose the request
Pick the intake, contract approval, matter update, or board pack the team handles most.
Map the sources
List the request channels, contract records, approvals, and owners behind the workflow.
Run a live matter
Test the workflow on a current request and review status, citations, and boundaries.
Hand over the queue
Deliver the current queue, open items, and update pack to the responsible legal owner.
In-house legal moves faster when the request, matter, and decision are one record.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this give legal advice?
No. It organizes requests and matters. Advice, privilege, and approvals stay with qualified counsel.
Can it approve contracts automatically?
No. It prepares the matter and decision pack. Approval and business sign-off stay with the company.
How is this different from the general counsel page?
That page is the general counsel's briefing layer. This page is the in-house team's operating queue: intake, matters, approvals, and updates.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the request queue
Which legal request keeps returning?
Tell us the request type, the sources, the approval route, and the legal owner. We will scope a workflow around the team's own queue.