Find the commitment
Extract dates, deliverables, notice periods, renewal terms, and approvals from contracts the team already holds.
Legal leadership / matter context and review packs
General counsel should answer from the file, not rebuild the file.
We build private workflows that search contracts and matter records, surface obligations and renewals, prepare litigation and board updates, and organize the evidence pack. Legal advice, privilege decisions, and final review stay with counsel.
Contract contextObligation trackerLitigation updatesMatter permissions
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where legal leadership loses time
The answer is usually in the matter file.
The expensive part is finding it, confirming it, and turning it into the short update the business asked for.
Prepare the current state
Combine docket, correspondence, deadline, and decision notes into a matter update for review.
Answer the board ask
Draft the legal risk summary, open questions, and decision points from approved matter material.
The legal boundary
The system supports the file. It does not become the lawyer.
Keep the privilege decision with counsel
Matter access, confidentiality, and privilege review remain the legal team's call before material enters a workflow.
Use approved matter records
Contracts, notes, correspondence, calendars, and filings stay connected to the output that uses them.
Final advice stays human
The workflow prepares drafts and findings. Advice, sign-off, and privileged conclusions belong to qualified counsel.
A first legal operations workflow
Choose one recurring legal pack.
Name the request
Pick contract renewals, litigation updates, a board pack, or a regulatory response that repeats.
Scope the matter corpus
Define which contracts, matters, and people are included and which stay outside the first workflow.
Test with real questions
Run the queries the team actually receives and review the citations, gaps, and boundaries.
Document the approval route
Record who owns each source, what the workflow may draft, and who must review before anything travels.
Legal leadership does not need faster answers as much as it needs faster confirmation.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this give legal advice?
No. It finds and prepares material from approved matter records. Advice, privilege, and final review stay with the legal team.
Can it track contract renewals?
It can extract dates and obligations from approved contracts and prepare a renewal review pack. The legal team decides what the dates mean and what action follows.
How is this different from the legal operations page?
That page covers the legal function's shared workflows. This page is the general counsel's own briefing layer across obligations, matters, and board asks.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the legal pack
Which legal request keeps returning?
Tell us the request, the matter material, and the approval boundary. We will scope the first workflow around the file you already trust.