Document the AI use
Record the system, provider, data, users, decisions, controls, and review owner.
Regulatory / FCA-regulated firms
FCA-regulated AI is an outcomes and governance record, not a vendor label.
We build private workflows that help regulated firms map AI use, governance, model risk, client outcomes, and review evidence into review-ready files. The workflow prepares the record; the firm and its advisers make the regulatory call.
AI inventoryGovernanceModel riskOutcomes review
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where regulated AI work loses time
The regulator expects the firm to explain its use.
The recurring work is connecting each AI system to its owner, data, model risk, controls, testing, and the outcomes the firm can evidence.
Prepare the model view
Organize the risk assessment, testing, limitations, and mitigation records for review.
Keep the evidence pack
Assemble client outcome checks, complaints, monitoring notes, and open questions.
The FCA boundary
The system prepares the record. It does not confirm approval.
No automatic submission
FCA communications, permissions, notifications, and filings remain with the firm and its advisers.
Firm obligations stay with the firm
Conduct rules, client duties, and regulatory judgment remain with the authorized firm.
Current guidance only
The FCA's current AI approach and rules are confirmed against the official text before use.
A first FCA workflow
Start with one AI system and one review pack.
Choose the system
Pick the AI use the firm needs to document, such as drafting, triage, credit, or advice support.
Map the record
List the data, users, outputs, controls, model risk, testing, and owner.
Run the evidence check
Compare current records with the defined fields and review missing or stale items.
Build the review pack
Prepare the summary, source index, and open questions for the responsible firm owner.
Regulated AI is easier to explain when the system, risk, and outcome are one record.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this get FCA approval?
No. It prepares governance and evidence records. FCA permissions, approvals, and regulatory decisions remain with the firm.
Can it help with a Consumer Duty assessment?
It can organize the evidence and outcomes pack for review. The firm and its advisers make the assessment.
How is this different from the SRA page?
That page covers solicitors regulation. This page is specific to FCA-regulated financial services governance and model risk records.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the AI system
Which AI use should become a governance record?
Tell us the system, the data, the users, and the responsible owner. We will scope the first review pack around the records the firm already holds.