Keep the records current
Organize the processing register, data categories, lawful basis notes, retention, and owners from approved documents.
Data protection / evidence and review packs
The DPO is asked to prove what the company does with personal data.
We deploy private workflows that map records of processing, prepare subject request files, assemble breach and audit packs, and keep evidence linked to the source records. The DPO and advisers decide what is sufficient and what happens next.
Records of processingSubject request prepBreach pack draftsEvidence links
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where DPO time goes
The answer already exists in scattered records.
The work is collecting it, checking it, and turning it into an evidence file another owner can review.
Prepare the subject file
Gather the records, search results, and response draft for a data subject request without deciding the legal answer.
Assemble the audit pack
Combine the register, evidence, open items, and response notes into a pack for an internal review or regulator.
The data protection boundary
The system prepares the evidence. It does not declare the outcome.
Use approved records
Policies, contracts, notices, logs, and retention records remain connected to the answer that uses them.
The DPO validates
The workflow drafts and flags gaps. The DPO and advisers decide whether a response or filing is correct.
No automatic regulator contact
Breach notifications, regulator submissions, and data subject responses require explicit human approval and a documented route.
A first DPO workflow
Start with one evidence family.
Choose the obligation
Pick records of processing, subject requests, breach follow-up, or training evidence with a clear owner.
Connect the records
Map the policies, logs, contracts, and systems that contain the evidence the obligation needs.
Run a real pack
Test the workflow on a recent request or review and fix missing sources or stale records.
Hand over the route
Document the source map, review owner, and approval route before any response travels.
A DPO is faster when the evidence is already one record instead of a search across every system.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Can it decide if we are compliant?
No. It organizes evidence and prepares drafts. The DPO and the client's advisers make the compliance judgment.
Can it respond to a data subject request?
It can prepare the records and a response draft. The organization and its advisers decide what is disclosed and when.
How is this different from the compliance officer page?
That page covers the general compliance function. This page is the DPO's own evidence layer across processing, requests, and breach follow-up.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the evidence family
Which DPO pack is hardest to keep current?
Tell us the obligation, the records it needs, and the review owner. We will scope the first workflow around the files you already hold.