Build the chronology
Organize events, evidence, statements, and records into a reviewable defence timeline.
Legal practice / criminal defence
Criminal defence runs on facts, chronology, and disclosure, not memory.
We build private workflows that organize disclosure indexes, fact chronologies, review packs, and deadline calendars for criminal defence cases. The workflow prepares the file; the defence lawyer owns strategy and the court owns the outcome.
Disclosure indexFact chronologyReview packsDeadline calendar
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where defence prep time goes
The case file grows faster than the team.
The recurring work is keeping the facts, disclosure, and deadlines aligned so the lawyer can find the story and the gaps.
Index the material
Prepare the disclosure list, source links, and missing or uncertain items for the lawyer.
Keep the calendar
Track hearings, filing dates, responses, and client follow-ups beside the case file.
The defence boundary
The system organizes the file. It does not run the defence.
Strategy stays professional
Defence strategy, privilege decisions, and client advice remain with the qualified lawyer.
Outcomes stay judicial
Verdicts, sentences, and procedural decisions remain with the court and the applicable process.
Case material stays scoped
Disclosure, client records, and sensitive material are separated by role and reviewed before they enter.
A first defence workflow
Start with the pack the team builds for each case.
Choose the case type
Pick the matter the practice handles most and the review pack that repeats.
Map the case material
List disclosure, statements, records, and deadlines behind the pack.
Prepare the chronology
Build the fact timeline, source index, and open questions for the lawyer.
Hand over the review
Deliver the draft and calendar to the responsible defence lawyer.
A defence file is stronger when the facts, disclosure, and deadline are one record.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this advise on a defence?
No. It organizes facts and disclosure. Strategy and advice stay with the qualified defence lawyer.
Can it file court documents automatically?
No. It prepares drafts and calendars. Filing and signing stay with the lawyer and the court process.
How is this different from the litigation page?
That page covers civil and general court work. This page is criminal defence specific: disclosure, chronology, and case calendar.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the case file
Which criminal defence pack takes the team longest?
Tell us the case type, the disclosure, the deadlines, and the reviewing lawyer. We will scope a workflow around the firm's own files.