Map the requirement
Organize policies, notices, and obligations into a register with the source and the evidence that supports it.
Compliance / evidence, controls, and review packs
Compliance work is evidence work, not just policy writing.
We build private workflows that map obligations to evidence, prepare control checks, and assemble review packs from approved policies, records, and correspondence. The compliance officer decides what is sufficient and what happens next.
Obligation registerEvidence packsControl checksReview boundaries
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where compliance time disappears
The obligation is only as good as the evidence.
A large share of the work is matching requirements to records, finding gaps, and preparing the answer for an auditor, regulator, or internal review.
Check the evidence
Prepare the control test, collect the records, and surface missing or stale evidence for the owner.
Assemble the pack
Turn the register, evidence, and open items into a review pack for an auditor, board, or internal owner.
The compliance boundary
The system prepares the evidence. It does not declare compliance.
Start with approved records
Policies, notices, logs, training records, and correspondence remain connected to the obligation they support.
The officer validates
The workflow flags gaps and prepares drafts. The compliance officer decides whether the evidence is sufficient.
No automatic filings
Regulator submissions, attestations, and corrective actions require explicit human approval and a documented route.
A first compliance workflow
Start with one obligation family.
Choose the obligation
Pick a policy, notice, registration, training, or reporting requirement with a clear owner and evidence set.
Register the evidence
List the records that support it, the update cycle, and the people responsible for each item.
Run the control test
Check current evidence against the requirement and review the missing, stale, or uncertain items.
Build the review pack
Prepare the summary, evidence index, and open questions for the person or committee that decides.
A compliance pack is easier to defend when the obligation, evidence, and owner are one record.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Can it file compliance returns?
No. It can prepare the evidence pack and checklist that support a filing, but the submission and responsibility stay with the compliance owner.
Does it decide whether we are compliant?
No. It organizes evidence and flags gaps. The compliance officer and the client's advisers make the compliance judgment.
What is a good first workflow?
One obligation family with visible evidence, such as training records, policy acknowledgements, registration returns, or incident follow-ups.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with one obligation
Which compliance pack is hardest to keep current?
Tell us the obligation, the evidence it needs, and the review owner. We will scope the first workflow around the records you already hold.