Map the claim elements
Break the relevant claim into elements, alternatives, and dependent features for a structured search.
IP workflow / patent search
Patent search starts with the claim, not the keyword.
We build private workflows that organize patent claims, technical disclosures, and prior art into searchable records with source references. The workflow prepares the evidence map; the patent professional owns the search strategy and conclusion.
Claim mapPrior art setEvidence memoProfessional review
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where patent search loses time
The claim defines what to find.
A useful search is built around the claim elements, priority date, jurisdiction, and known references before anyone starts scanning.
Organize the reference set
Index patent records, technical literature, standards, and product disclosures with sources and dates.
Prepare the evidence memo
Assemble relevant passages, element mappings, and open questions for the patent professional.
The patent boundary
The system organizes the record. It does not grant patent rights.
Keep citations attached
Every passage and mapping remains linked to the patent, publication, version, and date that produced it.
Strategy stays expert
Claim construction, relevance, novelty, inventiveness, and validity remain with the qualified patent professional.
No automatic filing
Filing, prosecution, and office actions remain explicit decisions by the applicant and its counsel.
A first patent search workflow
Start with one claim family and one reference set.
Choose the invention
Pick the patent family, draft claims, or technical disclosure the team needs to organize.
Define the record
List the claim elements, jurisdictions, dates, classifications, and reference fields.
Test with known art
Run the workflow against a completed search and compare element mappings and sources.
Deliver the evidence memo
Return the claim map, reference index, and open questions to the responsible professional.
A patent search is stronger when every element has a source and every gap has an owner.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this conclude whether an invention is patentable?
No. It organizes claims and references. Patentability and strategy conclusions stay with the qualified professional.
Can it search public patent databases?
Database access is a scoped integration with an approved source. The workflow organizes results; it does not replace the search strategy.
How is this different from the IP practice page?
That page covers IP practices broadly. This page is the specific recurring workflow: claim mapping, prior art organization, and evidence memos.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the claim family
Which patent search keeps returning to the same evidence?
Tell us the claim set, the reference sources, and the patent professional. We will scope the workflow around the records you already use.