Who is actually bound?
Extract the named parties, affiliates, representatives, and recipients covered by the agreement.
Contract workflow / NDA comparison and extraction
NDAs arrive in different wording, with the same obligations to compare.
We build private workflows that extract the key terms from NDA templates and incoming agreements, compare them against the firm's standard, and prepare a review note for the responsible person.
Term extractionClause comparisonRisk notesHuman review
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where NDA review loses time
The wording changes. The questions stay the same.
Every NDA needs the same check: who is covered, what is confidential, what is excluded, how long it lasts, and what happens when the deal ends.
What can be used and shared?
Identify confidentiality, exclusions, permitted disclosures, return or deletion, term, and remedies.
See the real differences
Match the incoming NDA against the firm's standard and flag material changes for review.
The legal boundary
The workflow prepares the map. The lawyer makes the call.
Keep the agreement connected
Every extracted term stays linked to the clause and document that produced it.
Your precedent is the baseline
The comparison uses the firm's approved standard and update history, not a generic internet checklist.
Advice stays with counsel
The system identifies differences and questions. Accepting risk, negotiating, and signing stay with the responsible lawyer.
A first NDA workflow
Build the review note the team already makes by hand.
Define the standard
Choose the firm's standard NDA, its accepted variants, and the terms that matter to the practice.
Connect the intake
Use the inbox, client folder, or upload path where NDAs arrive for review.
Test the extraction
Run real and unusual NDAs, including redlines, short forms, and agreements with unusual definitions.
Deliver the review note
Return the extracted terms, differences, and open questions as a draft the lawyer can finish.
An NDA review note is fastest when the agreement, the standard, and the differences are all visible.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this approve or reject an NDA?
No. It extracts and compares the terms and prepares a review note. The legal decision and negotiation stay with the lawyer.
Can it handle our existing NDA templates?
Yes. The workflow is built around the firm's own standard and variants so the comparison reflects the practice's actual position.
How is this different from contract search?
That page covers finding clauses across a larger archive. This page is a recurring review workflow with a fixed artifact: an NDA comparison note.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the NDA queue
How do NDAs arrive for review today?
Tell us the intake path, the standard, and the reviewer. We will scope a workflow around the firm's own precedent.