Map the wording
Organize definitions, coverage, limits, conditions, exclusions, and claims provisions with source links.
Insurance workflow / policy wording
Policy wording is reviewed clause by clause, product by product.
We build private workflows that extract coverage, limits, conditions, exclusions, and definitions from policy wording, compare product variants, and prepare review notes for the underwriter, product owner, or counsel.
Term extractionVariant compareWording notesProduct review
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where wording review loses time
One change can affect every variant.
The review work is finding where the same concept appears across endorsements, schedules, and past versions before deciding what should change.
See the variant gap
Compare product versions, endorsements, and market editions to surface intended and accidental differences.
Prepare the review memo
Summarize the change, affected clauses, open questions, and the product owner for approval.
The wording boundary
The system compares the paper. It does not price or promise cover.
Keep the wording attached
Every extracted term stays linked to the product version, endorsement, schedule, and page that produced it.
Product approval stays human
Underwriting, pricing, legal, and filing decisions remain with the insurer and its responsible owners.
No coverage conclusion
The workflow prepares wording notes. Whether a particular loss is covered remains a claim and policy decision.
A first wording workflow
Start with one product and one review cycle.
Choose the product set
Pick the policy wordings, endorsements, or variants the team reviews most.
Define the comparison
List the coverage, limit, condition, exclusion, and definition fields that matter.
Test with actual versions
Run the workflow on current, archived, and changed wordings and check the difference list.
Deliver the review note
Return the wording map, variant comparison, and open questions to the product owner.
Policy wording is easier to manage when every clause has a version and every change has an owner.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this approve policy wording?
No. It extracts and compares the language. Product, legal, underwriting, and regulatory approval remain with the insurer.
Can it handle long endorsement files?
Yes, where the file set and schedules are scoped. Wording review is tested on the client's actual versions.
How is this different from claims review?
That page prepares an individual claim file. This page is the product-level wording workflow: term extraction, variant comparison, and review notes.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the product set
Which policy wording takes the longest to compare?
Tell us the product versions, the review fields, and the product owner. We will scope the wording workflow around your actual files.