Locate the clause
Search approved agreements, precedents, policies, and templates for the language connected to the question.
Workflow / clauses, precedents, and obligations
Contract work is a search problem before it is a drafting problem.
We build a private search workflow over approved contracts, precedents, templates, and matter material. It surfaces clauses and source passages for review, tracks defined obligations, and keeps interpretation with the lawyer or commercial owner.
Source citationsMatter boundariesClause comparisonHuman review
Pattern demonstration / not legal advice
What the search should return
Find the useful passage, not just a keyword.
A contract search system should make the source and the question visible enough for a professional to decide what matters.
Show the difference
Compare versions, obligations, dates, or fallback language and point to the passages that changed.
Surface the deadline
Extract renewal or notice dates into a review queue without treating an extracted date as legal advice.
Search with the boundary intact
A fast answer cannot cross matters.
Keep sources separated
Matter, client, practice, or business-unit access must apply before the retrieval step.
Show the document
Citations, versions, dates, and a not-found response keep the search useful for professional review.
Leave interpretation human
The system can extract and compare. A qualified person decides legal meaning, risk, and external action.
The first search workflow
Start with one clause family or obligation list.
Choose the corpus
Name the contract family, practice group, matter set, or approved precedent collection.
Write the question set
Collect the questions people ask and the passage or answer a reviewer expects to find.
Test retrieval and dates
Check versions, access, citations, missing documents, extracted deadlines, and false matches.
Hand over the review path
Document source updates, permissions, test questions, limitations, and the person who approves the result.
The system should help a professional get to the clause faster, not make the professional pretend the clause explains itself.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Straight answers
Common questions.
Is this only for law firms?
No. Legal departments, procurement, finance, insurers, and professional-services teams can use the workflow where approved agreements and obligations need review.
Can it draft a contract?
It can prepare a draft from approved precedent as a separate scope. Review, negotiation, and legal judgment remain with the responsible professional.
How does it avoid mixing matters?
Matter-level sources, metadata, roles, retrieval rules, and tests are designed before the corpus is made available to users.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the clause
What contract question keeps returning?
Tell us the document family, users, access boundary, and output the reviewer needs.