Prepare the request list
Organize the schedule of requested items, owners, status, and dates for the engagement.
Audit workflow / working papers
Audit fieldwork is a review trail, not a pile of spreadsheets.
We deploy private workflows that prepare PBC lists, tie-out schedules, evidence links, and review notes for the audit team's own methodology. The workflow assembles the file; the auditor reviews, concludes, and owns the opinion.
PBC listTie-out schedulesEvidence linksReview notes
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where audit prep time goes
The evidence exists, but the trail takes time to build.
The recurring work is assembling support, checking that figures tie, and making it obvious where the team reviewed and concluded.
Link the figures
Connect trial balance, lead schedules, support, and prior-year files into a reviewable trail.
Keep the review notes
Surface open items, responses, and conclusions beside the working paper that triggered them.
The audit boundary
The system organizes the file. It does not perform the audit.
The team's methodology stays
The workflow supports the firm's own methodology and documentation rules instead of replacing them.
Auditors own conclusions
Testing, sampling, evaluation, and the audit opinion remain with the qualified engagement team.
No invented support
Every output is linked to source records and marked as draft until the responsible auditor reviews it.
A first working-paper workflow
Start with one recurring schedule.
Choose the schedule
Pick the working paper, PBC list, or tie-out the team rebuilds every engagement.
Map the sources
List the ledger, support, client schedules, and prior-year files behind the schedule.
Run the tie-out
Compare figures and sources, flag differences, and prepare the evidence links for review.
Hand over to the auditor
Deliver the draft, open items, and review notes to the responsible engagement team member.
An audit file is easier to review when the figure, the support, and the conclusion stay together.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this replace the audit team?
No. It prepares and connects working papers. Testing, evaluation, and the audit opinion stay with qualified auditors.
Can it populate the firm's audit software?
The first workflow uses the firm's formats and records. Direct software writes require explicit scope and integration testing.
How is this different from the finance operations page?
That page covers internal finance work. This page is the audit engagement layer: PBC, evidence, tie-out, and review trail.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the schedule
Which audit schedule takes the team longest?
Tell us the schedule, the sources, the firm's methodology, and the reviewer. We will scope a workflow around the records the team already uses.