Summarize what is in scope
Prepare a cited matter brief from approved documents without mixing files from another matter or business unit.
Legal operations / matters and obligations
Surface the issue before it becomes a deadline.
We set up private legal-operations workflows that search approved matter material, compare contracts, track renewals, and prepare cited briefs for counsel review. The system supports legal work; it does not give legal advice.
Matter boundariesSource citationsRenewal queuesCounsel review
Pattern demonstration / not legal advice
The legal-ops queue
Keep the routine visible without flattening the judgment.
Legal operations is a strong workflow candidate because the recurring work is document-heavy and the review boundary can be explicit.
Track the dates that matter
Extract renewal, notice, and obligation details into a review queue with the source and date visible.
Bring differences forward
Compare approved contract versions or clauses and leave interpretation and negotiation with counsel.
What the system must not blur
Extraction is not legal conclusion.
Keep the boundary
Matter-level access and client or business-unit separation are part of the architecture, not a later promise.
Show the document
A clause, date, or summary should point back to the document and version that supplied it.
Keep advice human
Legal interpretation, filing, negotiation, and external communication remain with qualified counsel.
A first matter workflow
Make the review path explicit.
Choose the matter set
Define the practice, business unit, contract family, or obligation list that can be safely used for the pilot.
Set the access boundary
Map who can see which documents and which questions must return a not-found or escalate response.
Test extraction and citations
Review dates, clauses, missing versions, conflicting language, and unsupported interpretations with counsel.
Hand over the runbook
Document the data path, update process, test set, credentials, known limits, and review owner.
A legal workflow earns trust by making the source and the boundary visible before it tries to make the answer sound certain.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this provide legal advice?
No. It can search, extract, compare, summarize, and prepare drafts from approved material. Qualified counsel owns interpretation and decisions.
How is this different from the law-firm page?
The law-firm page centers on client matters and precedent search. Legal operations centers on an internal legal function managing the company's obligations, contracts, and queue.
Can it track contract renewals?
Yes, if the source documents, dates, owners, and review process are defined. The output is a cited queue, not an unreviewed legal action.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with one matter flow
Which legal-operations task keeps returning?
Tell us the document set, access boundary, recurring date or question, and the person who reviews the output.