Track the official source
Monitor approved regulators, notices, consultations, guidance, filings, and updates for the jurisdictions that matter.
Proactive intelligence / regulatory watch
Regulatory change is useful only when it reaches the right owner.
We build a monitored regulatory workflow around approved notices, regulators, jurisdictions, topics, and internal policies. It identifies what changed, links the source, asks who may be affected, and routes the review to a qualified person.
Approved sourcesCited changesApplicability queueQualified review
Pattern demonstration / no legal advice
The regulatory information problem
A notice is not yet an action.
Teams need the change, the source, the affected scope, and the person who can decide whether an obligation applies.
Summarize the change
Show what changed, when, why it was included, and which internal policy or process may need review.
Send the question to the owner
Route an applicability or implementation question to legal, compliance, finance, operations, or another qualified owner.
Do not automate legal conclusions
The brief informs the review; it does not close it.
Use official material
Keep the notice, date, jurisdiction, and source link attached to the summary.
Separate relevance from certainty
A possible impact should become a question for review, not an unqualified claim that a rule applies.
Put a person on the queue
The client decides who reviews, records, updates, communicates, and approves any implementation.
A regulatory watch
Start with one jurisdiction and topic.
Define the scope
Choose regulator, jurisdiction, topic, source family, recipient, cadence, and what counts as material.
Connect the official sources
Use public sources or client-approved subscriptions with terms, rate limits, and access recorded.
Build the evidence brief
Collect, deduplicate, cite, summarize, mark uncertainty, and state when no material change was found.
Route the review
Send the item to a named qualified owner and record corrections, applicability, action, or no-action.
The value of regulatory monitoring is not sounding certain. It is getting the right source and question to the right person early.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Straight answers
Common questions.
Does this provide legal or compliance advice?
No. It monitors approved sources and prepares a cited review queue. Qualified advisers and client owners decide what applies.
Can it monitor multiple countries?
Yes, if the source families, terminology, languages, and review owners are defined. Each country adds a real review and maintenance requirement.
Can it update our policies automatically?
It can draft a change summary or policy update for review. Publishing a policy or changing a control requires a human owner.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the regulator
Which regulatory changes should not surprise you?
Tell us the jurisdiction, source, topic, recipient, and review owner. We will help define a monitorable first brief.