Turn the document into criteria
Extract eligibility, questions, evidence, word limits, deadlines, and submission rules.
Business development / grants and procurement responses
The response wins on fit, not on starting from scratch.
We build private workflows that parse grant or RFP requirements, score eligibility against the firm's facts, map evidence to criteria, and draft response sections from approved precedent and company material.
Requirement parseEligibility scoreEvidence mappingDraft sections
Pattern demonstration / same workflow, synthetic material
Fixed-scope setupClient-owned accountsDraft-and-review firstFull handover
Where response teams lose time
Most of the answer is already in the firm.
The work is finding it, checking it against the criteria, and shaping it into the format the funder or buyer asked for.
Check the real fit
Compare the firm's facts, projects, registrations, and capacity against the requirements before drafting.
Write from approved material
Prepare response sections using the firm's own precedents, qualifications, and proof rather than invented claims.
The bidding boundary
The system drafts the fit. The firm owns the submission.
No invented qualifications
Every claim is mapped to an approved record, registration, project, or fact the firm can prove.
Human final pass
The responsible owner reviews the score, the draft, and the evidence before any response leaves the firm.
Submission stays manual
The workflow prepares the pack. Uploading, signing, and submitting remain an explicit human action.
A first response workflow
Build the response the team already writes by hand.
Choose the response type
Pick grant applications, RFP answers, proposal sections, or qualification packs with a known format.
Load the firm facts
Provide registrations, projects, policies, CVs, and approved precedents as the evidence base.
Test a real requirement
Run the workflow against a past application and compare the score and draft with what was submitted.
Hand over the review pack
Deliver the criteria map, evidence index, draft, and open questions to the response owner.
A good response is not longer. It is more exactly fitted to the criteria.
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Straight answers
Common questions.
Can it guarantee we win?
No. It can improve fit and reduce drafting time, but the funder or buyer makes the decision.
Can it invent qualifications?
No. Every claim is mapped to approved firm evidence. Unsupported or missing proof stays visible as an open item.
How is this different from proposal drafting?
That page covers drafting from precedent. This page is the recurring bid workflow: parse, score, map evidence, and draft against external criteria.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with a live requirement
Which grant or RFP is next?
Send the requirement and the firm facts. We will scope a workflow that maps evidence before drafting.