What actually moved
Track product, pricing, leadership, funding, hiring, partnership, filing, or market changes on the defined list.
Proactive intelligence / competitor watch
Know what a competitor changed before the meeting asks.
We build a standing competitor-monitoring workflow around a defined watchlist, approved public and private sources, relevance rules, and a delivery schedule. The output explains what changed, why it may matter, and where the evidence lives.
Named competitorsSource timestampsNoise filteredHuman decision
Pattern demonstration / fictional competitors
What the watch should answer
A competitor feed is not a pile of alerts.
The team needs the small number of changes that could affect a conversation, product decision, account, or market position.
Why it may matter
Compare the change with the team's priority and prior context instead of forwarding every mention.
Where the signal came from
Return source links, timestamps, uncertainty, and a clear statement when nothing material changed.
Monitoring has a quality problem
The service is relevance, not collection.
Choose the entities
The team defines which competitors, products, markets, people, and events belong in the watch.
Tune the noise
Deduplication, novelty, confidence, and materiality rules decide whether an item reaches a person.
Show stale sources
A missed run, broken source, or uncertain signal should be visible rather than silently becoming an empty brief.
A competitor watch
Start with one market and a short list.
Define the watchlist
Choose competitors, products, markets, sources, delivery time, recipients, and what counts as material.
Connect approved sources
Use public sources directly and private client sources through scoped, revocable access.
Build the evidence brief
Collect, deduplicate, compare, cite, summarize, and mark uncertainty or no material change.
Tune with human corrections
Record false alarms, missed signals, stale sources, and changes that make the brief more useful.
A competitor-monitoring agent should help a team notice the few changes worth discussing, not make everyone subscribe to more noise.
Pricing / fixed scope
Know the starting numbers before you ask.
The final quote follows the workflow. Infrastructure and model bills stay on your accounts.
One Workflow
Starting from$3,500 / ₦2.5m
2 to 3 weeksOne workflow for a small team, with training and handover.
See the one-workflow packageFirm-wide
Starting from$7,500 / ₦8m
4 to 6 weeksMultiple sources, roles, integrations, and admin handover.
See the deploymentAnnual support
Starting from$3,000 / ₦1.5m
per yearStandard care for one delivered workflow. Optional. Larger deployments and active monitoring are separately scoped.
See supportArchitecture review from $500. Standard annual support is $3,000 / ₦1.5m per year for one delivered workflow. New workflows, integrations, active monitoring, and infrastructure are separately scoped; infrastructure, model, storage, and messaging bills stay on client accounts. Full pricing and what changes the quote
Why trust Pristine3D?
We build and operate production software.
Pristine3D Ltd builds and operates live digital products, and we run private AI workflows internally as part of our own operations. We scope around your real workflow: the documents you own, the questions your team asks, and the access boundary you approve. Based in Lagos, Nigeria, we work remotely with clients worldwide.
We already run live products
Based in Lagos, Nigeria, Pristine3D currently builds and operates smartcards.ng, venu.ng, photoshoot.ng, and ugc.ng in production.
We start with the actual workflow
One input, one output, one test set, and one person who owns the result. We scope a real workflow instead of a transformation programme.
The boundary stays visible
Cloud, model, storage, and messaging accounts stay in your name. The chosen data path, access rules, test record, documentation, and training are part of the agreed scope.
Straight answers
Common questions.
Which sources can it monitor?
Approved public sources and client-owned private feeds where access, terms, and delivery are defined.
Can it predict a competitor's next move?
No. It reports observed changes and evidence. The team decides what they mean and what to do.
How is this different from the daily intelligence brief?
This page is a specific competitor watch with a focused list and relevance rules. The daily brief is the broader standing-intelligence offer.
Own your knowledge base
The model is not the product. The knowledge base is.
Documents, the retrieval index, access rules, and the workflows built around them are the asset, and they compound. We deploy so the knowledge base stays yours: on your accounts, in the environment you choose, under access rules your team defines. The model behind the answers is a connector, so the knowledge base moves with you, not with a vendor.
Your corpus, your index
The document store, metadata, and retrieval setup live on accounts you own. No vendor holds the corpus.
Models are swappable parts
Change the model provider, move regions, or go local without rebuilding the knowledge base or the workflow.
The knowledge base is the alpha
Every improvement to the corpus improves the answers, and the improvement stays with you, not with a vendor.
Keep exploring
Related setups.
Start with the competitors
What should your team know before it finds out second?
Tell us the watchlist, source types, delivery time, and what counts as a meaningful change.